Abstract
Literatur
Abascal, Almudena/Karg, Silke/Kretschmer, Regine/Schaffrath-Rosario, Angelika/ Schweikert, Florian (2016): Brasilien: Der Kampf der Guarani-Kaiowá um Land und Würde. FIAN Fact Sheet 1. Köln. www.fian-berlin.de/wp-content/ uploads/files/2016-1_FS_Guarani_final_screen.pdf, 4.11.2021.
ABIEC (2020): Beef Report. Brazilian Livestock Profile. São Paulo. http://abiec. com.br/en/publicacoes/beef-report-2020-2/, 9.9.2021.
Agarwal, Bina (1998): The Gender and Environment Debate. In: Keil, Roger/Bell, David V.J./Penz, Peter/Fawcett, Leesa (Hg.): Political ecology. Global and local. London/New York: Routledge, 193-219.
Alimonda, Héctor (2011): La colonialidade de la naturaleza. Una aproximación a la ecología política latinoamericana. In: Alimonda, Héctor (Hg.): La naturaleza colonizada. Ecología política y minería en América Latina, Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 21-58.
Almeida, Rosemeire Aparecida de (2003): Identidade, distinção e territorialização. O processo de (re)criação camponesa no Mato Grosso do Sul. Dissertation. Universidade Estadual Paulista.
Assunção, Juliano/Pietracci, Breno/Souza, Priscila (2016): Fueling Development. Sugarcane Expansion Impacts in Brazil. https://climatepolicyinitiative.org/ wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Paper_Fueling_Development_Sugarcane_Expansion_Impacts_in_Brazil_Working_Paper_CPI.pdf.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Backhouse, Maria (2019): Agrarkraftstoffe. In: Brunner, Jan/Dobelmann, Anna/ Kirst, Sarah/Prause, Louisa (Hg.): Wörterbuch Land- und Rohstoffkonflikte. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839444337-004.
Backhouse, Maria (2020): The knowledge-based bioeconomy in the semi-periphery. A case study on second-generation ethanol in Brazil. Working Paper 13 der BMBF-Nachwuchsgruppe „Bioökonomie und soziale Ungleichheiten“. www.bioinequalities.uni-jena.de/sozbmedia/workingpaper13.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Backhouse, Maria (2021): Global Inequalities and Extractive Knowledge Production in the Bioeconomy. In: Backhouse, Maria/Lehmann, Rosa/Lorenzen, Kristina/Lühmann, Malte/Puder, Janina /Rodríguez, Fabricio/Tittor, Anne (Hg.): Bioeconomy and Inequalities. Socio-Ecological Perspectives on Biomass Sourcing and Production across South America, Asia and Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68944-5.
Backhouse, Maria/Lorenzen, Kristina/Lühmann, Malte/Puder, Janina/Rodríguez, Fabricio/Tittor, Anne (2017): Bioökonomie-Strategien im Vergleich. Gemeinsamkeiten, Widersprüche und Leerstellen. Bioeconomy and Inequalities Working Paper 1. Jena. www.bioinequalities.uni-jena.de/sozbemedia/neu/2017- 09-28+workingpaper+1.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Bemmann, Martin/Metzger, Birgit/Detten, Roderich von (2014): Einleitung. In: Metzger, Birgit/Bemmann, Martin/Detten, Roderich von (Hg.): Ökologische Modernisierung. Zur Geschichte und Gegenwart eines Konzepts in Umweltpolitik und Sozialwissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 7-32. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845256948_11
Birch, Kean (2017): Innovation, Regional Development and the life science. Beyond clusters. London/New York: Routledge.
Blaikie, Piers M./Brookfield, H. C./Allen, Bryant James (1994): Land degradation and society. London/New York: Routledge.
Borges, Uta/Freitag, Heiko/Hurtienne, Thomas/Nitsch, Manfred (1984): PROAL- COOL. Analyse und Evaluierung des brasilianischen Biotreibstoffprogramms. Saarbrücken: Verlag Breitenbach.
Borras, Saturnino M./Franco, Jennifer C./Kay, Cristóbal/Spoor, Max (2011): Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean viewed from broader interna- tional perspectives. Rom. www.tni.org/files/download/borras_franco_kay__ spoor_land_grabs_in_latam__caribbean_nov_2011.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Brunner, Jan (2017): Die Verhandlungsmacht von Arbeiter*innen und Gewerkschaften in landwirtschaftlichen Transformationsprozessen: Eine Analyse des Zuckerrohrsektors im Bundesstaat São Paulo. GLOCON Working Paper Series 6. Berlin. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/199099, 9.9.2021.
Caliari, Tânia (2016): Adeus, Guyraroká. https://apublica.org/2016/09/adeus- guyraroka/, 9.9.2021.
Damasceno, Rita/Chiavari, Joana/Lopes, Cristina Leme (2017): Evolution of Land Rights in Rural Brasil. Framework for understanding, pathways for improvement. Rio de Janeiro. www.inputbrasil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Evolu- tion_of_Land_Rights_In_Rural_Brazil_CPI_FinalEN.pdf,9.9.2021.
Defante, Lilliane Renata/Vilpoux, Olivier François/Sauer, Leandro (2018): Rapid expansion of sugarcane crop for biofuels and influence on food production in the first producing region of Brazil. In: Food Policy 79, 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.06.005
Domingues, Alex Torres (2017): A territorialização do capital canavieiro no Mato Grosso do Sul. O caso da Bunge em Ponta Porã/MS. Masterarbeit. Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados.
Elwert, Georg (2002): Feldforschung. Orientierungswissen und kreuzperspektivische Analyse. Sozialanthropologisches Arbeitspapier. Freie Universität Berlin. www.latautonomy.com/DE_FeldforschungNEU.PDF, 9.9.2021.
European Commission (2018): A sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. Brüssel. https://doi.org/10.2777/792130.
Fabrini, João E. (2008): A posse e concentracão de terra no sul de Mato Grosso do Sul. In: Almeida, Rosemeire Aparecida de (Hg.): A questão agrária em Mato Gross do Sul. Uma visão multidisciplinar. Campo Grande: UFMS, 53-79.
Fatheuer, Thomas (2019): Zuckerträume. Ethanol aus Brasilien in der globalen Klimapolitik. Berlin: FDCL. www.fdcl.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/ FDCL_Zuckertra%CC%88ume_web.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Felix, Joel/Boydston, Rick/Burke, Ian C. (2011): Potato Response to Simulated Glyphosate Drift. In: Weed Technology 25 (4), 637-644. https://doi.org/10.1614/ WT-D-11-00001.1
Fernandes, Bernardo Mançano (1999): Contribuição ao Estudo do Campesinato Brasileiro Formação e Territorialização do Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais sem Terra − MST (1979–1999). Dissertation. Universidade de São Paulo.
Giersdorf, Jens/Nitsch, Manfred (2006): Biodiesel in Brasilien − ein neues PROÁL-COOL oder Chance für den Nordosten? KAS-Länderberichte Focus Brasilien. www.kas.de/documents/252038/253252/7_dokument_dok_pdf_7949_1. pdf/1be38a01-9bfc-b9c7-c088-afa911989dd2?version=1.0&t=1539665577294, 9.9.2021.
Gudynas, Eduardo (2019): Extraktivismen. Erscheinungsformen und Nebenwirkungen. In: Ramírez, Martín/Schmalz, Stefan (Hg.): Extraktivismus. Lateinamerika nach dem Ende des Rohstoffbooms. München: oekom, 19-38.
Harding, Sandra G. (2011): Introduction: Beyond Postcolonial Theory: Two Under-theorized Perspectives on Science and Technology. In: Harding, Sandra G. (Hg.): The postcolonial science and technology studies reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822393849-001
Harvey, Mark/Bharucha, Zareen P. (2016): Political Orientations, State Regulation and Biofuels in the Context of the Food-Energy-Climate Change Trilemma. In: Salles-Filho, Sergio Luiz Monteiro/Cortez, Luís Augusto Barbosa/da Silveira, José Maria F.J./Trindade, Sergio C. (Hg.): Global bioethanol. Evolution, risks, and uncertainties. London: Academic Press, 63-92. https://doi. org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803141-4.00003-4
Hatterman-Valenti, Harlene M. (2014): Simulated Glyphosate Drift to Potato Mother Plants and Effect on Daughter Tubers Used for Seed Production. In: Weed Technology 28 (1), 253-258. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-13-00107.1
Herrera, Selena/Wilkinson, John (2021): Sugar-Cane Bioelectricity in Brazil: Reinforcing the Meta-Discourses of Bioeconomy and Energy Transition. In: Backhouse, Maria/Lehmann, Rosa/Lühmann, Malte/Puder, Janina/Rodríguez, Fabricio/Tittor, Anne (Hg.): Bioeconomy and Inequalities. Socio-Ecological Perspectives on Biomass Sourcing and Production across South America, Asia and Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 151-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-030-68944-5_8
Hutchinson, Pamela J.S./Felix, Joel/Boydston, Rick (2014): Glyphosate Carryover in Seed Potato: Effects on Mother Crop and Daughter Tubers. In: American Journal of Potato Research 91 (4), 394-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-013- 9363-7
IPCC (2019): Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse gas fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Summary for Policymakers. www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2019/08/Edited-SPM_Approved_Microsite_FINAL.pdf, 4.11.2021.
Jasanoff, Sheila (Hg., 2004): States of knowledge. The co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge.
Karatepe, Ismail Doga/Scherrer, Christoph/Tizzot, Henrique (2020): Das Mercosur-EU-Abkommen: Freihandel zu Lasten von Umwelt, Klima und Bauern. Wiesbaden. www.uni-kassel.de/einrichtungen/fileadmin/datas/einrich- tungen/icdd/2020-01-24_EUMercosurAbkommen_01.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Kleinschmit, Daniela/Lindstad, Berit Hauger/Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark/Toppinen, Anne/Roos, Anders/Baardsen, Sjur (2014): Shades of green. A social scientific view on bioeconomy in the forest sector. In: Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29 (4), 402-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.921722
Lapola, David M./Schaldach, Ruediger/Alcamo, Joseph/Bondeau, Alberte/Koch, Jennifer/Koelking, Christina/Priess, Joerg A. (2010): Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biodiesel in Brazil. In: PNAS 107 (8), 3388- 3393. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907318107
Levidow, Les/Birch, Kean/Papaioannou, Theo (2012): Divergent Paradigms of European Agro-Food Innovation: The Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy (KBBE) as an R&D Agenda. In: Science, Technology, & Human Values 38 (1), 94-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912438143
Lorenzen, Kristina (2019): Sugarcane Industry Expansion and Changing Land and Labor Relations in Brazil. The Case of Mato Grosso do Sul 2000–2016. Bioeconomy and Inequalities Working Paper 9. Jena. www.bioinequalities.uni-jena. de/sozbemedia/WorkingPaper9.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Lorenzi, Bruno Rossi (2018): Etanol de Segunda Geração no Brasil: política e trans-lações. Dissertation. Universidade Federal de São Carlos.
Lorenzi, Bruno Rossi/Andrade, Thales Haddad Novaes de (2019): O Etanol da segunda geração no Brasil: Políticas e redes sociotécnicas. In: Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 34 (100), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1590/3410014/2019
Mengel, Aléx Alexandre (2015): Modernização da agricultura e pesquisa no Brasil: a Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária – EMBRAPA. Dissertation. Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro.
Milanez, Artur Yabe/Souza, Jose Antonio P./Mancuso, Rafael (2017): Panoramas Setoriais 2030. Sucroenergético. Rio de Janeiro. web.bndes.gov.br/ bib/jspui/bitstream/1408/14245/2/Panoramas%20Setoriais%202030%20-%20 Sucroenegerg%c3%a9tico_P_BD.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Mintz, Sidney W. (1986): Sweetness and power. The place of sugar in modern history. New York: Penguin Books.
Miotto, Tiago (2018): Comunidade Guarani Kaiowá busca reverter no STF decisão que anulou demarcação. https://cimi.org.br/2018/09/comunidade-guarani- kaiowa-busca-reverter-no-stf-decisao-que-anulou-demarcacao/, 9.9.2021.
Mol, Arthur P.J./Spaargaren, Gert/Sonnenfeld, David A. (2014): Ecological Modernisation Theory: Where Do We Stand? In: Metzger, Birgit/Bemmann, Martin/Detten, Roderich von (Hg.): Ökologische Modernisierung. Zur Geschichte und Gegenwart eines Konzepts in Umweltpolitik und Sozialwis- senschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 35-66.
Moreno, Camila (2017): Landscaping a Biofuture in Latin America. Berlin: FDCL www.fdcl.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/FDCL_BIOEC_EN18072017-2. pdf, 9.9.2021.
Nardoque, Sedeval/Melo, Danilo Souza/Kudlavicz, Mieceslau (2018): Questão Agrária em Mato Grosso do Sul e seus Desdobramentos Pós-Golpe de 2016. In: OKARA: Geografia em debate 12 (2), 624-648. https://doi.org/10.22478/ ufpb.1982-3878.2018v12n2.41333
OECD (2009): The Bioeconomy to 2030. Designing a policy agenda. Paris. www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264056886-en.pdf?expires=1611321448&id=id&accname=oid011481&checksum=441415F961CC3EA3F180EDD9BFB 79DC5, 9.9.2021. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264056886-9-en
OECD/FAO (2018): Agricultural Outlook 2018−2027. Rome/Paris. www.fao.org/3/I9166EN/I9166EN.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Pavão, Eugênio Da Silva (2005): Formação, estrutura e dinâmica da economia do Mato Grosso do Sul no contexto das transformações da economia Brasileira. Florianópolis. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30382814.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Repórter Brasil (2014): As condições de trabalho no setor sucroalcooleiro. http:// reporterbrasil.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/26.-Folder_Sucroalcooleiro_ web_baixa.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Robbins, Paul (2012): Political ecology. A critical introduction. Malden, Mass.: J. Wiley-Blackwell.
Robles, Wilder (2018): Revisiting Agrarian Reform in Brazil, 1985–2016. In: Journal of Developing Societies 34 (1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0169796X17749658
Salina, Fernando Henriques/Almeida, Isabela Aroeira de/Bittencourt, Felipe Ribeiro (2020): RenovaBio Opportunities and Biofuels Outlook in Brazil. In: Sayigh, Ali (Hg.): Renewable Energy and Sustainable Buildings. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 391-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 18488-9_30
Salles-Filho, Sergio Luiz Monteiro (2016): Conclusions: Futures of Bioethanol − Main findings and prospects. In: Salles-Filho, Sergio Luiz Monteiro/Cortez, Luís Augusto Barbosa/Silveira, José Maria F.J. da/Trindade, Sergio C. (Hg.): Global bioethanol. Evolution, risks, and uncertainties. London: Academic Press, 238-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803141-4.00023-X
Sant’Anna, Ana Claudia/Shanoyan, Aleksan/Bergtold, Jason Scott/Caldas, Marcellus M./Granco, Gabriel (2016): Ethanol and sugarcane expansion in Brazil. What is fueling the ethanol industry? In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 19 (4), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.22434/ IFAMR2015.0195
Schildberger, Barbara/Hanak, Karel/Regner, Ferdinand (2007): Untersuchung von Herbizidschäden im österreichischen Weinbau. In: Gesunde Pflanzen 59 (1), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-007-0142-6
Tittor, Anne (2021): Towards an Extractivist Bioeconomy? The Risk of Deepening Agrarian Extractivism when Promoting Bioeconomy in Argentina. In: Backhouse, Maria/Lehmann, Rosa/Lühmann, Malte/Puder, Janina/ Rodríguez, Fabricio/Tittor, Anne (Hg.): Bioeconomy and Inequalities. Socio-Ecological Perspectives on Biomass Sourcing and Production across South America, Asia and Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 309-329. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-68944-5_15
TNI/Hands on the Land (2015): The Bioeconomy. A primer. Transnational Insti- tute. www.tni.org/files/publication-downloads/tni_primer_the_bioeconomy. pdf, 9.9.2021.
Tyfield, David/Lave, Rebecca/Randalls, Samuel/Thorpe, Charles (2017): Introduction. Beyond crisis in the knowledge economy. In: Tyfield, David/Thorpe, Charles/Lave, Rebecca/Randalls, Samuel (Hg.): The Routledge Handbook of the Political Economy of Science. London: Taylor and Francis, 1-18. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315685397-1
Umweltbundesamt (2017): Biomassekaskaden. Mehr Ressourceneffizienz durch Kaskadennutzung von Biomasse – von der Theorie zur Praxis. Dessau- Roßlau. www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/1410/publika- tionen/2017-06-13_texte_53-2017_biokaskaden_abschlussbericht.pdf, 9.9.2021.
USDA (2019): Brazil: Biofuels Annual. GAIN Report Number: BR19029. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/report/downloadreportbyfilename?filename=Biofuels%20Annual_Sao%20Paulo%20ATO_Brazil_8-9-2019.pdf, 9.9.2021.
USDA (2020): Oilseeds and Products Annual. Brazil. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Oilseeds%20and%20Products%20Annual_Brasilia_Brazil_04-01-2020, 9.9.2021.
Wilkinson, John (2015): The Brazilian sugar alcohol sector in the current national and international conjuncture. Rio de Janeiro. http://actionaid.org.br/ wp-content/files_mf/1493419528completo_sugar_cane_sector_ing.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Wilkinson, John/Herrera, Selena (2008): Os agrocombustíveis no Brasil. Quais perspectivas para o campo? Brasília, DF. www.observatoriodoagronegocio.com. br/page41/files/AgroCBRPerspectivasNov08.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Wilkinson, John/Herrera, Selena (2010): Biofuels in Brazil: debates and impacts. In: Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (4), 749-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.20 10.512457
Winter, Rainer (2009): Cultural Studies. In: Flick, Uwe/Kardoff, Ernst von/Steinke, Ines (Hg.): Qualitative Forschung. 7. Auflage. Reinbek: Rowohlt, 204-212.
Yin, Robert K. (2009): Case Study Research. Design and Methods. 4. Auflage. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage.